Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) is employee's behavior that goes against the legitimate interests of an organization.
The next tool, Counterproductive Behavior Index (CBI) [2], is presented by the authors in the form of an integrity test. This procedure is used to select and identify candidates whose work-related behaviors, attitudes and values are likely to interfere with their success as employees.
The document concludes by discussing scales used to measure counterproductive behaviors and preliminary results from a study of Polish public sector workers, finding low levels of serious counterproductive actions.
The author proposed a very practical tool for measuring counterproductive work behavior in the form of a validated and adapted to Central European cultural conditions CWB-C PL scale. The scale is 10 items shorter than the original version of this measuring instrument.

This particular example perfectly highlights why Measures Of The Counterproductive Behavior Scale is so captivating.
We were interested to identify a valid measure of counterproductive work behavior for the military domain and we chose the CWB scale, which is a part of the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire (IWPQ).
The range of counterproductive behaviors includes both minor acts (e.g., lateness) and even criminal activities that may be directed towards individuals or the organization (e.g., scams or physical aggressions) (Rotundo & Spector, 2017).
Counterproductive Work Behaviour Scale is a 29-item scale designed by Suzy and Spector (2003) to measure integrity, emotion, violence and intentional acts of individuals in work place or counterproductive work behaviour.

3.2 Measurement Scales Counterproductive behavior, as the dependent variable in this study, was measured using the. scale developed by Bennett and Robinson (2000), which was adapted and translated.
The scale measuring counterproductive behavior consists of five items and has a five-point rating scale (never to often). For each scale, one can calculate a score by adding the item scores, and dividing their sum by the number of items in the subscale; therefore, for every subscale...